Liability vs Full Coverage

[webdev]

Where do you draw the line of purchasing liability or full coverage for insuring your car? I remember reading on geico's website the other day, full coverage is not suggested for all vehicles. Somethings they say you should consider are the age and value of the vehicle. So in other words, if its going to cost you $2,000 to fully insure your vehicle, and it's only worth 1,500, it probably is not worth it. What is the oldest vehicle you think you would get full coverage on?

[commes]

To me, it shouldn't be a matter of how old it is.  Because it really depends on the condition of the car, if it's a classic car that your getting insurance for, thats in top condition, then I'd want full coverage on it.

-Commes